Setup to closeout, every row.
A systematic pass over payment, schedule, risk, subs, and closeout, not a skim for scary words.
Specset works the agreement, general conditions, and special provisions through a systematic checklist and returns a severity-flagged review table: the clauses that shift risk to you, what each one means, and the paragraph behind every flag.
Payment obligation to subcontractors is conditioned on owner payment. Cash-flow risk transfers downstream; flag for negotiation or pricing.
A systematic pass over payment, schedule, risk, subs, and closeout, not a skim for scary words.
Severity and impact notes tied to the exact clause, so review meetings argue positions, not page numbers.
Your team and your attorney make the calls. They just start from a cited map of the risk.
“The pay-if-paid clause was buried in the supplementary conditions. The review put it in row one with the paragraph beside it.”
Contract risk hides in the edits: the supplementary conditions and special provisions that modify the standard forms. The checklist works all of it, in context.
Name the document, or let the agent locate the contract content itself, signed agreements in the documents, special provisions in the specifications.
The review runs as its own background agent, working every checklist row against the contract documents instead of skimming for scary words.
Every row carries a severity flag, an impact note, and the clause citation. Ask follow-up questions in the thread; the answers cite the same paragraphs.
The review is the start of a record you can question. Notice deadlines, flow-down obligations, payment terms: answers come back with the governing paragraph attached, all project long.
How many days do we have to notice a delay, and to whom?
Written notice within 7 calendar days of the event, to the Engineer, with the cost and time impact stated or estimated. Continuing delays require weekly updates.
The signed agreement and its amendments, general and supplementary conditions, and the Division 00 and 01 content in the specifications, including special provisions. Name a specific document, or let the agent locate the contract content across the project record.
No. It is a systematic, cited review that puts the contractor-unfavorable clauses on the table with severity flags and impact notes. Your project leadership and your counsel make the judgments; they just start from a map instead of a cold read.
Contract setup, changes, work planning, scheduling, cost and billing, subcontracting, risk and insurance, document control, and closeout. Each row is checked against the contract documents and returned with a severity flag and impact note.
A row in the review table: the checklist item, what the contract says, a severity flag, an impact note in plain language, and the clause citation. High-severity rows lead the summary so the pay-if-paid clause is not finding number forty.
Yes. Each review runs against whichever document you name: a subcontract, a GMP amendment, a change order package. A re-run is a fresh, independent review with its own table, so you can compare positions across versions.
The table lives with the project. Ask follow-up questions in the thread and get answers cited to the same clauses, route edits and re-reviews from the review itself, and carry the notice deadlines into how the job is run.
Send an agreement and its conditions. We'll return the severity-flagged table, cited clause by clause, before your review meeting.